Are skyscrapers necessary with today’s telecommuting technology?
Where I work, we hold live meetings with people in North America and India. We share the same software code, etc.
Tags: india, north america, software code
Where I work, we hold live meetings with people in North America and India. We share the same software code, etc.
Tags: india, north america, software code
November 13th, 2009 at 04:03
In some cases yes. The reason I can come up with is that certain goegraphic areas specialize in economic sectors (for a few loose examples, New York=financial, San Jose=computers, etc.) Within these geographical ares, realestate runs scarce and the ability to build "out" diminishes. The only option left is to build "up".
Not to mention the income potential for a developer to collect money on a square footage basis. The building has a foot print no matter how tall. The taller the building the more floors of square footage.
November 13th, 2009 at 04:03
Skyscrapers have more to do with the dollar value per square foot of the land under them than with any telecommuting technology. Urban real estate has a value far in excess of any software programs, and probably some of the real estate in downtown Manhattan in the Wall street area has a greater value than all the software in the world ever written all combined.
November 13th, 2009 at 04:03
Maybe one day you will never have to see another human ever, except on a television screen. That will be a sad but very possible day.