Are skyscrapers necessary with today’s telecommuting technology?

Where I work, we hold live meetings with people in North America and India. We share the same software code, etc.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Buy Nomad Guide Book Here

Tags: , ,

3 Responses to “Are skyscrapers necessary with today’s telecommuting technology?”

  1. John K Says:

    In some cases yes. The reason I can come up with is that certain goegraphic areas specialize in economic sectors (for a few loose examples, New York=financial, San Jose=computers, etc.) Within these geographical ares, realestate runs scarce and the ability to build "out" diminishes. The only option left is to build "up".

    Not to mention the income potential for a developer to collect money on a square footage basis. The building has a foot print no matter how tall. The taller the building the more floors of square footage.

  2. freedomhammer2007 Says:

    Skyscrapers have more to do with the dollar value per square foot of the land under them than with any telecommuting technology. Urban real estate has a value far in excess of any software programs, and probably some of the real estate in downtown Manhattan in the Wall street area has a greater value than all the software in the world ever written all combined.

  3. takeashot30 Says:

    Maybe one day you will never have to see another human ever, except on a television screen. That will be a sad but very possible day.

Leave a Reply

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes